In Rust, the Core i3-12300T is faster than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-12300T
- Up to 17% faster in Rust – 245 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 16, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-12300T vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-12300T vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-12300T vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-12300T
Jan 16th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-12300T Jan 16th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 16th, 2022 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
