In Atomfall, the Core i3-12300T is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-12300T
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 224 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jan 27, 2022 vs Oct 03, 2018
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-12300T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
93%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-12300T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-12300T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-12300T
Jan 27th, 2022
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-12300T Jan 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | SP3r2 |
35W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
