In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-12300T is slightly slower than the Core i7-950. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-12300T
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Jan 18, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-950
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-12300T vs Core i7-950: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-12300T vs Core i7-950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-12300T vs Core i7-950 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-12300T
Jan 18th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-12300T Jan 18th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 18th, 2022 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
