The Core i3-1215U is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7502. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-1215U
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 15 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 8 threads
Core i3-1215U vs EPYC 7502
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-1215U
Feb 23rd, 2022
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-1215U vs EPYC 7502 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-1215U vs EPYC 7502 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-1215U vs EPYC 7502 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-1215U
Feb 23rd, 2022
Cores
6-core
19%
L3 Cache
10 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-1215U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7502 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 23rd, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Alder Lake-U | Codename | Rome |
15 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 10 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
