The Core i3-1125G4 is a faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7502. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-1125G4
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 28 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 8 threads
Core i3-1125G4 vs EPYC 7502
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-1125G4
Sep 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-1125G4 vs EPYC 7502 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-1125G4 vs EPYC 7502 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-1125G4 vs EPYC 7502 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-1125G4
Sep 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
12%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3733 MHz
100%
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-1125G4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7502 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Tiger Lake-U | Codename | Rome |
28 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3733 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
