In Deathloop, the Core i3-1125G4 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-1125G4
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 241 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 31, 2021
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-1125G4
Mar 31st, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
64%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
3733 MHz
67%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-1125G4 Mar 31st, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 31st, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 3733 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Xe-LP Graphics G4 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
