The Core i3-10320 is a much faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G, however, it's the same value for money, as it's $34.06 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 31% cheaper – $74.93 vs $108.99
Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$108.99
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
72%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
95%
Min 1% FPS
119
95%
Price, $
$74.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
