The Core i3-10320 is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-8700 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $31.20 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 22% cheaper – $108.99 vs $140.19
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i7-8700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Core i3-10320 vs Core i7-8700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$108.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$140.19
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
77%
Core i3-10320 vs Core i7-8700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |