Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $139.99 vs $319.97
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-14700KF - $0.50 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - 289 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 28 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
45%
Price, $
$319.97
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |