The Core i3-10320 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $21.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 13% cheaper – $137.99 vs $159.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-3210 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$137.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-3210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
