Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 635 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10320 - 454 vs 421 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $76.80 vs $139.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-10320 - $0.17 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7269 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7269 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |