The Core i3-10320 is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105T and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $19.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- A faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i3-10105T
- Up to 17% cheaper – $89.99 vs $108.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-10105T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$108.99
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
86%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
183
97%
Min 1% FPS
122
98%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-10105T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-10105T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-10105T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |