Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Core i3-10300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $108.87 vs $269.95
- Up to 56% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-12900KF - $0.89 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10300 - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
44%
Price, $
$269.95
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10300 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |