The Core i3-10110U is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-10110U
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 25 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
The Core i3-10110U is better in every way
Core i3-10110U vs Celeron G3930 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10110U
Aug 21st, 2019
Average FPS
294
100%
Min 1% FPS
172
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10110U vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10110U vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10110U vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10110U
Aug 21st, 2019
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10110U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Comet Lake-U | Codename | Kaby Lake |
25 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
