In Rust, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Xeon X5675. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 222 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5675
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X5675: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X5675 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X5675 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X5675
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5675 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
