In Deathloop, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Xeon W3680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 11 years newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3680
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon W3680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon W3680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon W3680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3680
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3680 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
