In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 35 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 76% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 189 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1078.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
18%
L3 Cache
6 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
