In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2667 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 187 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-2667 v2: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2667 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
