In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 9 years and 9 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1650
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 193 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-1650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-1650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-1650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1650 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
