In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1603 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1603 v3
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 184 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1603 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1603 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
