In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 177 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 07, 2020
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 35 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
170 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
96%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
6 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Feb 7th, 2020 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | TRX4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 280 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
