Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 384 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - $89.99 vs $126.98
- Up to 22% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 5700 - $0.49 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105T - 200 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $126.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |