In Deathloop, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Pentium G3420. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Pentium G3420
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Pentium G3420: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Pentium G3420
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.03
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Pentium G3420 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Pentium G3420 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Pentium G3420
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Pentium G3420 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35W | Power Consumption | 54W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
