In Rust, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 223 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8320
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
79%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
