In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the FX-4350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-4350
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
