In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Core i9-9820X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 177 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9820X
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i9-9820X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
173 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
98%
Price, $
$619.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i9-9820X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i9-9820X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
36%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9820X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $889.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
