In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 227 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
213 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
94%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
