In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Core i7-6800K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 176 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-6800K
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-6800K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
99%
Price, $
$72.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-6800K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-6800K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6800K May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | May 31st, 2016 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $434.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
