In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Core i7-3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Nov 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 35 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-3970X
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 189 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-3970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3970X Nov 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Nov 1st, 2012 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $990.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
