In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Core i7-3630QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-3630QM
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 191 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-3630QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3630QM
Sep 30th, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-3630QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-3630QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-3630QM
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3630QM Sep 30th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 30th, 2012 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $378.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
