In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-10105T is slower than the Core i5-11600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 20% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 142 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
142 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $237.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
