In Deathloop, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$183.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
