In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 227 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
224 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
99%
Price, $
$165.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
