In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Core i3-3240. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i3-3240
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-3240: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-3240 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-3240 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
