In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Core i3-3217U
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 248 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
