In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Celeron G3900
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
