In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105T is slightly slower than the Celeron 1007U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
Celeron 1007U
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Celeron 1007U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Celeron 1007U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Celeron 1007U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 20th, 2013 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
