In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Xeon X3450
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
174 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
88%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
