In Deathloop, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Up to 16% faster in Deathloop – 256 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
220 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
86%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
51%
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM5 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
