Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 669 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $86.30 vs $185.00
- Up to 46% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.65 vs $1.21 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - 153 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7318 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7319 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |