The Core i3-10105F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7742 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $1576.45 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 97% cheaper – $56.99 vs $1633.44
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 65 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 8 threads
Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7742
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7742 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7742 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7742 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
6 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
EPYC 7742
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.25 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7742 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Comet Lake-R | Codename | Rome |
65 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 64 |
| 8 | Threads | 128 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 256 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
