In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
84%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
