In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 225F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $49 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 31% cheaper – $109.00 vs $157.97
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall – $0.51 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 5 225F
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 241 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 5 225F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
88%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 225F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$157.97
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
78%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 5 225F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 5 225F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 225F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 225F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $231.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
