In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $260 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 65% cheaper – $138.99 vs $399.00
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.80 vs $4.63/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
89%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
34%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
