Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $84.39 vs $487.33
- Up to 81% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-13900K - $0.49 vs $2.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-10105F - 187 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
172
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $84.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
19%
Price, $
$487.33
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $487.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |