In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 221 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
95%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
