In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10105F is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-980X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $81 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 26% faster in Battlefield 6 – 77 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years newer
- Up to 43% cheaper – $109.00 vs $189.95
- Up to 43% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.41 vs $3.11/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-980X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
61 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
79%
Price, $
$189.95
57%
Value, $/FPS
$3.11/FPS
45%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
