In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly faster than the Core i7-930 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $168 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer
- Up to 55% cheaper – $138.99 vs $307.29
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
89%
Price, $
$307.29
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
