In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105F is slower than the Core i7-720QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Core i7-720QM
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 207 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-720QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
174 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
85%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-720QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-720QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $364.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
