In Rust, the Core i3-10105F is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $12 more expensive!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 226 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-6700
- Up to 11% cheaper – $97.17 vs $109.00
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Rust – $0.43 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
90%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
222 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
95%
Price, $
$97.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jul 1st, 2015 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
